Managed to try this at my AD, am surprised they already have it I find the hands and hr indices too intensely black, same as the 6196P salmon.. not very convinced
More seriously, I have always had a soft spot for the celestial complication and the 6105G is very cool but it is also out of reach. The 5610/1P is lovely but in a small collection it would only make sense instead of my blue 5711/1A which has been getting
But 47mm is very large even for a lugless watch.. in any case, it’s cool to see a lugless patek case I particularly like the 5810/1G and 5227G Finally a dateless 2 hand nautilus and it’s nice that they reworked the 5227 case to thicken the bezel.. the pre
1. 6105G-001: It dares to present a design they never did before. The Richard Mille for intellectuals, if you will... 2. 5810/1G-001: The 41mm size and the 240 microrotor movement makes this very compelling to me and I would love to own one (if that happe
Where do you stand on the 5196G? Is it worthy of its historical lineage? The 5196g is the Patek I like. Discreet elegance that you only glimpse under the sleeve. A path that modern Patek has largely lost. I don't like the 6119. The mouvement should be big
5227G. I also think this watch deserves much more credit. But, at the same time, I would like the date disc to match the dial (like in the black dial variant) and I find the central rotor a little less exciting than the micro rotor Chopard proposes in its
Dear Fellow-PP friends, I‘ve got a question regarding a beautiful 5227g that I could get my hands on. Ref 5227 was officially introduced in April 2013… Is anybody familiar with how that watch could have made it‘s way through the NY Tiffany boutique in Aug
I purchased this 5227g a year ago and have been trying to describe to myself how it makes me feel. This last week, I was playing around with some photos and think I found a way to glimpse at how that empty ivory dial sinks in with me. It has a bit of a lo